Patentability Assessment Suite

One evidence-linked patentability workflow

Literature search, novelty, inventive step, and claim strategy remain linked to the approved claim, reviewed documents, and recorded evidence. Patent professionals can inspect the reasoning, check the citations, and decide what to do next.


How It Works

Four stages, one pipeline

01
Literature Search
Identify candidate prior art across supported sources
02
Novelty Check
Test uniqueness per claim feature
03
Inventive Step
Assess obviousness via EPC method
04
Claim Strategy
Strengthen and reformulate claims
Input: Claims disclosure, technical context, search report, referencesCurrent output: Evidence-linked Patentability Assessment

Stage 01

Literature Search

Targeted topic extraction and semantic search across supported scientific-literature and patent sources. Identifies and ranks candidate prior art without retaining submitted disclosure text as a search cache.

Key Features
  • Topic extraction direct from your claims
  • Crossref scientific-literature coverage
  • EPO patent database coverage
  • Google Patents public-data retrieval and source links
  • Relevance scoring with justifications
  • English search; native Chinese, Japanese and Korean queries when enabled
  • Ranked candidate register with source links

Stage 02

Novelty Checker

Structured claim decomposition into approved technical features, each mapped against the reviewed prior-art documents. Per-feature novelty analysis follows EPC Article 54.

Key Features
  • Claim-to-feature conversion with approval
  • Feature-by-feature disclosure analysis
  • Per-feature prior art mapping
  • Conflict identification with citations

Stage 03

Inventive Step Assessment

Structured EPC problem-solution approach to assess whether the claimed subject-matter appears to involve an inventive step over the identified prior-art combinations.

Key Features
  • EPC problem-solution approach
  • Closest prior art identification
  • Technical effect analysis
  • Obviousness assessment with reasoning

Stage 04

Claim Strategy

Identifies weaknesses in your proposed claims and recommends specific reformulations to overcome prior art exposure. Helps you build more defensible patent applications.

Key Features
  • Weakness identification in claims
  • Specific reformulation suggestions
  • Prior art exposure mitigation
  • Claim strengthening strategies

Report Outputs

What you get

Patentability Assessment

Novelty and inventive step evaluated separately, with feature-level evidence, prior-art citations, and conclusions prepared for IP-team review.

Opposition Report

In development

Grounds for opposition and the vulnerable claims in a competitor patent, mapped to the prior art.

Prosecution Dialogue

In development

Draft responses to office actions and examiner objections for your attorneys to review and refine.

FTO Mapping

In development

Freedom-to-operate analysis mapping a product against relevant patent claims.


Review the report before starting a case

Inspect the feature model, search record, disclosure matrix, novelty analysis, inventive-step routes, and claim-amendment workflow in a complete sample assessment.